NECSI logo

Impact of ethanol conversion and speculation on Mexican corn imports

www.necsi.edu
New England Complex Systems Institute
238 Main Street Suite 319, Cambridge, MA 02142
Phone: 617-547-4100 Fax: 617-661-7711

Truthout Spotlight G20: Will Mexico Lead Action on Biofuels, Food Crisis?
by Timothy A. Wise
Emerging Markets Calls grow for global food price action
by Phil Thornton
Human Dignity and Humiliation Studies Effects of US Ethanol Expansion on Mexico
by wardeez
Triple Crisis

Marco Lagi, Alexander S. Gard-Murray, Yaneer Bar-Yam

Cite as: Marco Lagi, Alexander S. Gard-Murray and Yaneer Bar-Yam "Impact of ethanol conversion and speculation on Mexico corn imports", New England Complex Systems Institute, http://necsi.edu/
research/social/foodprices/mexico/
(May 2012)


Dramatic increases in food prices over the last few years have severely impacted vulnerable populations worldwide, triggering riots in more than 30 different countries. Many factors have been proposed as causes for the price increases, from adverse weather to meat consumption in China, from increases in oil prices to exchange rates. In a recent paper [1,2], we tested these factors one by one, and constructed a model that explains what is behind the odd behavior of food prices. The results show there are just two main causes: increasing corn-to-ethanol conversion in the United States and excessive financial speculation.

Not only do we know that these are the two causes, we also know what part of food prices is due to each. In 2009 almost all of the food price increase was due to ethanol conversion, while in 2008 and 2010 food price increases were largely due to speculation.

Price increases dramatically affect poor populations, who may find themselves unable to afford basic food commodities. Due to the efficiency of industrialized agriculture in developed countries, price increases also generally impact the balance of trade of countries to the benefit of developed countries and to the detriment of poorer developing countries.

We consider here the case of Mexico, one of the biggest corn importers in the world, and the costs associated with corn imports.

In order to determine the contributions of ethanol conversion and speculation on corn prices, we adjust the food price model previously obtained by scaling it to corn prices. The similarity of the behavior of food prices and corn prices ensures that the result is a reasonable fit (see Fig.1). Using the resulting data we estimate the fraction of corn import costs that are due to ethanol conversion and speculation over time. Results are shown in Table 1.

Fig. 1 Scaling of the food price model Fig.1 Corn price (blue line) and curves showing the causes of price increases according to our quantitative model (red dashed line). The green dashed dotted line is the supply and demand equilibrium impacted by the demand shock due to increasing corn to ethanol conversion. The quantitatively modeled speculation contribution to prices is the difference between the total and the supply and demand curve. The corn price without ethanol shock or speculation would be essentially constant (black dotted).

BaselineEthanolSpeculation
200479700
2005873370
20069801250
20071199308324
20081069459813
200981052357
201081473863
20118731059292
Total741332481549
Table 1. Contributions of the individual components to the net corn import costs of Mexico, from 2004 to 2011, in million $US (rounded to nearest million). Corn trade data includes cracked corn [5].

We find that over the last 8 years  the increase in ethanol conversion cost Mexico about $3.2 billion, while financial speculation added another $1.4 billion to the total corn import cost of $12.2 billion. This corresponds to an increase in import costs of about 27% for the entire period due to ethanol conversion, consistent with previous estimates that do not include the effect of investments [3]. Financial speculation added another 13%, with the largest share coming in 2007-8, when speculation alone increased prices and import costs by 76%. While the analysis starts in 2004, almost all of the excess cost is in the time period 2006-2011.

These results demonstrate the impact of US policy changes,  including subsidies for ethanol conversion and deregulation of financial markets. The resulting price increases benefited exporters (usually developed countries) to the detriment of importers (usually developing countries).  Rapid action is needed to reduce the ongoing impacts of the price increases on global hunger and social unrest. The results described here are incorporated in a report by the Global Development and Environment Institute for the G20 in 2012 [4].


[1] M. Lagi, Yavni Bar-Yam, K.Z. Bertrand, Yaneer Bar-Yam, The Food Crises: A Quantitative Model of Food Prices Including Speculators and Ethanol Conversion arXiv:1109.4859, September 21, 2011.

[2] M. Lagi, Yavni Bar-Yam, K.Z. Bertrand, Yaneer Bar-Yam, UPDATE February 2012 — The Food Crises: Predictive validation of a quantitative model of food prices including speculators and ethanol conversion. arXiv:1203.1313, March 6, 2012.

[3] Bruce A. Babcock, The Impact of US Biofuel Policies on Agricultural Price Levels and Volatility, ICTSD Issue Paper No. 35 (June 2011, Available from: http://www.iadb.org/intal/intalcdi/PE/2011/08442.pdf)

[4] Timothy A. Wise, The Costs to Mexico of U.S. Ethanol Expansion, GDAE Working Paper No. 12-01, Medford, Massachusetts (2012, Available from: http://www.ase.tufts.edu/gdae/Pubs/wp/12-01WiseBiofuels.html)

[5] Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau, Foreign Trade Statistics (2012, Available from: http://www.fas.usda.gov/gats/ExpressQuery1.aspx)